Pre-Deposit Refund Is a Statutory Right on the Dropped Portion — Finality Is Assessed Segment-Wise, Not for the Entire Appeal: Bombay HC in IBM India • Composite Multi-Year SCN Under Section 73 Is Not Permissible: Bombay HC Follows Its Own Milroc and Rite Water Rulings, Distinguishes Delhi HC's Contrary View • Show Cause Notice in Name of Dead Proprietor Is a Nullity: Calcutta HC Sets Aside OIO, Directs Fresh SCN to Legal Heirs Under Section 93(1)(b) • ITC Cannot Be Denied to Bona Fide Buyer for Supplier's GSTR-3B Default; Section 74 Cannot Be Colourably Invoked to Overcome Limitation: Calcutta HC in Cart Infralog • West Bengal AAR Rules on GST for International Airlines: Five Scenarios Settled, Transportation of Human Remains Held Outside Supply • Isabgol Divergence Continues: Three More Rajasthan AARs Hold 5% GST, Maintaining Clear Break From Gujarat AAR's NIL Position • Composite Assessment Order for Multiple Tax Periods — Unsigned — Quashed: Andhra Pradesh HC in VNR Traders • Rule 96(10) SC Ruling Applied in Madras HC: Four Pending Refund Denial Orders Remanded for Reconsideration
3 articles tagged with this topic
The Bombay High Court has held that where a first appellate authority partially drops a demand — setting aside 64% of the adjudicated liability — the taxpayer's…
The Bombay High Court has reaffirmed its position that a single show cause notice under Section 73 of the CGST Act covering multiple financial years is without…
The Bombay High Court has quashed National Anti-Profiteering Authority orders against three real estate developers in two companion judgments decided on the sam…
Showing 1–3 of 3 articles