Pre-Deposit Refund Is a Statutory Right on the Dropped Portion — Finality Is Assessed Segment-Wise, Not for the Entire Appeal: Bombay HC in IBM India • Composite Multi-Year SCN Under Section 73 Is Not Permissible: Bombay HC Follows Its Own Milroc and Rite Water Rulings, Distinguishes Delhi HC's Contrary View • Show Cause Notice in Name of Dead Proprietor Is a Nullity: Calcutta HC Sets Aside OIO, Directs Fresh SCN to Legal Heirs Under Section 93(1)(b) • ITC Cannot Be Denied to Bona Fide Buyer for Supplier's GSTR-3B Default; Section 74 Cannot Be Colourably Invoked to Overcome Limitation: Calcutta HC in Cart Infralog • West Bengal AAR Rules on GST for International Airlines: Five Scenarios Settled, Transportation of Human Remains Held Outside Supply • Isabgol Divergence Continues: Three More Rajasthan AARs Hold 5% GST, Maintaining Clear Break From Gujarat AAR's NIL Position • Composite Assessment Order for Multiple Tax Periods — Unsigned — Quashed: Andhra Pradesh HC in VNR Traders • Rule 96(10) SC Ruling Applied in Madras HC: Four Pending Refund Denial Orders Remanded for Reconsideration
3 articles in this category
The Supreme Court has used a GST investigation case to resolve two important questions of law concerning arrest powers under the CGST Act — and in doing so has…
I. The Core Question: Can an Omitted Restriction Still Block a Live Refund? GST law taxes domestic consumption, not exports. The zero-rating architecture of Se…
The Supreme Court has conclusively resolved the most contested procedural question to have emerged from the October 2024 omission of Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rul…
Showing 1–3 of 3 articles