Latest

Alleged Reuse of E-Way Bill for Pan Masala Consignment: Penalty Set Aside Where Revenue Failed to Establish Prior Delivery by Cogent Evidence — GSTAT Lucknow Bench Holds Presumption Cannot Replace Proof • Amended Rule 89(5) Formula Including Input Services Is Curative and Retrospective — Supplementary Refund Claims for Earlier Periods Are Admissible: GSTAT Lucknow Bench Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal • Excess Stock Found During Survey: Proceedings Under Section 130 Unsustainable, Section 73/74 Is the Only Permissible Route — GSTAT Agra Bench Dismisses Revenue’s Appeals Against Brick Field Operators • SC Permits Filing of GSTAT Appeal Without Pre-Deposit Where SCN Was Issued Before Pre-Deposit Amendment Came Into Effect — Question of Retrospective Applicability Left Open • Supreme Court Issues Notice on Portal Tab Service Issue — Whether Uploading Notice Under ‘Additional Notices/Orders’ Instead of ‘Notices and Orders’ Constitutes Valid Service • GSTAT Ghaziabad Bench Dismisses Three Departmental Appeals at Threshold for Falling Below Rs. 20 Lakh Monetary Limit — Lays Down Comprehensive Jurisprudence on Section 120 and Departmental Litigation Discipline • Licensing Copyright in Cinematographic Films Is Classifiable Under SAC 997332 at 12% GST, Not as Information Technology Software at 18% — Bombay HC Quashes Rs. 80 Crore Demand Against Dharma Productions, Holds Orders Suffered From Jurisdictional Error • Double Payment of IGST Due to GSTR-3B Column Error: Excess Amount Refundable, Cannot Be Retained by Revenue — GSTAT Thiruvananthapuram Bench Applies Article 265

Category

AAR

17 articles in this category

← Prev12

Showing 10–17 of 17 articles